Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
gstreamer_video_compression [2020/04/16 02:00] wf68spef |
gstreamer_video_compression [2020/04/17 10:49] (current) wf68spef |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
To be able to efficiently send the image data over a wireless datalink, one option is to compress the video data using h264/h265 encoders. Those two are often implemented in a hardware-accelerated way on the onboard computers like RPI and Jetson Nano. We can use these encoders to compress the video data to about 1000kBit/s and keep some kind of acceptable quality in the images to be processed by the image analysis algorithms ( to be tested! ) on a basestation computer. | To be able to efficiently send the image data over a wireless datalink, one option is to compress the video data using h264/h265 encoders. Those two are often implemented in a hardware-accelerated way on the onboard computers like RPI and Jetson Nano. We can use these encoders to compress the video data to about 1000kBit/s and keep some kind of acceptable quality in the images to be processed by the image analysis algorithms ( to be tested! ) on a basestation computer. | ||
+ | These kind of compression is also used in existing solutions mentioned in https://www.hs-augsburg.de/homes/beckmanf/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=searchwing-wifibroadcast. | ||
====== Tests ====== | ====== Tests ====== | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
Testimages and results can be found here: https://cloud.hs-augsburg.de/s/sm6taLQCAyWMY6F | Testimages and results can be found here: https://cloud.hs-augsburg.de/s/sm6taLQCAyWMY6F | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Image compression in general ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/818515|Comparison of lossless image compression algorithms]] |