Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
searchwing-fiber [2021/03/07 11:53] beckmanf Add test results |
searchwing-fiber [2021/03/08 12:34] beckmanf [First Lamination Test] typo |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| * [[https://youtu.be/s8uSAbvXaIA|Youtube: SearchWing - Wassertest]] | * [[https://youtu.be/s8uSAbvXaIA|Youtube: SearchWing - Wassertest]] | ||
| - | There must still be air/voids in the laminate although it seems optically in good condition. | + | There must still be air/voids in the laminate although it seems optically in good condition. The fuselage half has a weight of 116g. |
| + | |||
| + | {{::sw-2020305-80cm-rumpf.jpg|First Laminate - Weight 116g}} | ||
| === Ideas === | === Ideas === | ||
| Line 73: | Line 75: | ||
| * Hand lamination without vacuum. The hand lamination will have more resin in the laminate and the surface seems closed. No idea if the voids are reduced or if there is just a closed surface. | * Hand lamination without vacuum. The hand lamination will have more resin in the laminate and the surface seems closed. No idea if the voids are reduced or if there is just a closed surface. | ||
| * Vacuum infusion. Compared to vacuum bagging literature claims that voids are reduced with this technique. The VAP membrane technology might be a way. This promises a void free laminate with a high fiber content. | * Vacuum infusion. Compared to vacuum bagging literature claims that voids are reduced with this technique. The VAP membrane technology might be a way. This promises a void free laminate with a high fiber content. | ||
| + | * Degassing the resin. Is probably useless for hand lamination because bubbles are introduced during the lamination process. | ||
| (Friedrich Beckmann, 7.3.2021) | (Friedrich Beckmann, 7.3.2021) | ||